Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > / Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > | Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > N.B. if you put a file called 'catalog' in a directory, you cannot > | > prevent some SGML systems (e.g, SP and it's relatives) from using it > | > if any SGML or XML file is opened from that directory. > | > | I wonder if that's a problem for us. People should never be working > | out of that directory.... OTOH perhaps you can never be too paranoid. > > Any DTD or module loaded out of that directory counts as using it...so > you'll *always* be using it :-)
Ok, we'll avoid that name. I hate mysterious side-effects. > | I don't know if we wanna try to standardize that catalog name -- seems > | a bit silly / overreaching. > > Already been done, that's why SP loads it. Any file called "catalog" > or "CATALOG" gets loaded. (Silly and overreaching though that probably was.) Well, I meant in the context of an LSB or Debian SGML/XML standard. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
