> >Nothing is using libc6-sparc64 though. > > OK, well, since it's easier to upgrade libc6 than it is to downgrade to > stable, that's what I tried, and it did seem to fix the problem. Sounds > like it's time for a bug report on libc6 2.3.1-16. > > Thanks for all of your help.
You might try libc6 2.3.2-1 before filing a bug report. Just to save some folks some time. Glad things are working for you again. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
