Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Package: cpp > > Version: 1:2.95-2 > > Severity: important > > > > the latest version of cpp doesn't provide a symbolic link from > > /lib/cpp to /usr/bin/cpp. this breaks a number of programs (xdm > > being one of them). > > /lib/cpp depends on /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95/cpp. Does this > link still makes sense? Or should /lib/cpp a copy of > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95/cpp (not identical to /usr/bin/cpp). >
doesn't /usr/bin/cpp end up calling /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95/cpp? anyway, i think /lib/cpp should be linked to /usr/bin/cpp (still trying to come up with a good reason why). can somebody explain the difference between /usr/bin/cpp and /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95/cpp? --alex-- -- | I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active | | advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with | | automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion | | and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. |
