debian-toolchain  

Messages by Thread

• Intention to drop multilib support from architecture cross bootstrap (rebootstrap) Helmut Grohne
• Actual case of harm due to linux-libc-dev vs c-t-b difference: input-utils Helmut Grohne
• Architecture baseline for Forky Bastian Blank
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Bastian Blank
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Tony Rodriguez
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Marco d'Itri
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Jan-Daniel Kaplanski
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Simon Richter
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Tony Rodriguez
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Geert Uytterhoeven
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky kiruthikaanbusuresh
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Marcin Juszkiewicz
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Martin
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Peter Green
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Peter Green
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Rob Landley
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Marc Haber
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Tony Rodriguez
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Rob Landley
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Colin Watson
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Nikos Tsipinakis
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Milan Kupcevic
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Bastian Blank
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Marc Haber
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Kurt Roeckx
  • Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Romain Dolbeau
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Marc Haber
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Diederik de Haas
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Marc Haber
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Diederik de Haas
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD) jbranso
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD) Paul Tagliamonte
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD) John David Anglin
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD) Philipp Kern
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Jan-Daniel Kaplanski
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) David Starner
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Jan-Daniel Kaplanski
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) David Starner
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Christopher Huhn
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Riccardo Mottola
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Falco Girgis
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • AW: Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Jan-Daniel Kaplanski
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Marc Haber
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? Riccardo Mottola
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? Jaromír Cápík
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? Riccardo Mottola
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky John Klos
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Sicelo
  • Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Hermann . Lauer
  • Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky John Klos
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Mateusz Jończyk
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Holger Levsen
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Rob Landley
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Gerardo Ballabio
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• SBOM generation for Debian packages is difficult Vyom Yadav
• [Help] Specific options to cross-compile gcc and g++ Jose Gomez
• Bug#1107126: is cross-gcc-dev still useful or can it be removed? Helmut Grohne
  • Bug#1107126: is cross-gcc-dev still useful or can it be removed? Dima Kogan
• Clarification Request Regarding CVE-2025-1176 Affecting binutils Sunil Kumar Dora
  • Re: Clarification Request Regarding CVE-2025-1176 Affecting binutils Salvatore Bonaccorso
• Processing of cross-gcc_249_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• cross-gcc_249_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Bug#1063684: cross-gcc-dev: needs update for gcc-13 Samuel Thibault
  • Bug#1063684: marked as done (cross-gcc-dev: needs update for gcc-13) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Re: Bug#1063684: cross-gcc-dev: needs update for gcc-13 Dima Kogan
• Bug#973414: rustc: produces non-baseline opcodes for compiler_builtins::int::udiv::__udivmoddi4 on i386 James Addison
• cross-gcc_248_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of cross-gcc_248_source.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Bug#1029958: cross-gcc-dev: gcc-13: update hunk context Helmut Grohne
  • Bug#1029958: marked as done (cross-gcc-dev: gcc-13: update hunk context) Debian Bug Tracking System
• cross-gcc_247_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of cross-gcc_247_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Bug#1028094: support gcc-13 Helmut Grohne
  • Bug#1028094: marked as done (support gcc-13) Debian Bug Tracking System
• cross-gcc_246_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of cross-gcc_246_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Bug#1000461: add support for gcc-12 Helmut Grohne
  • Bug#1000461: add support for gcc-12 Dima Kogan
  • Bug#1000461: marked as done (add support for gcc-12) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#1000461: add support for gcc-12 Dima Kogan
• Bug#996432: ITS: newlib John Scott
• NMU to provide a newlib-source package John Scott
  • Re: NMU to provide a newlib-source package Simon Richter
• Dealing with libcc1 in Multi-Arch: foreign cross-compiler John Scott
• Making a bare-metal cross Binutils package John Scott
  • Re: Making a bare-metal cross Binutils package Wookey
  • Re: Fwd: Making a bare-metal cross Binutils package Nicolas Boulenguez
  • Re: Fwd: Making a bare-metal cross Binutils package John Scott
  • Re: Fwd: Making a bare-metal cross Binutils package Matthias Klose
  • Re: Fwd: Making a bare-metal cross Binutils package Nicolas Boulenguez
• Processed: closing 977944 Debian Bug Tracking System
• The need to retool [binutils|gcc]-source during package builds John Scott
• cross-gcc_245_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of cross-gcc_245_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Bug#977944: add support for gcc-11 Helmut Grohne
• Bug#956855: consider reducing toolchain bootstrap stages Helmut Grohne
• Saludos Mariana Quintal
• cross-gcc_243_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of cross-gcc_243_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Bug#951470: cross-ma-install-location.diff no longer applies to gcc-10 Helmut Grohne
  • Bug#951470: marked as done (cross-ma-install-location.diff no longer applies to gcc-10) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Re: Bug#950490: transition: gnat-9, Ada component of GCC-9 Ludovic Brenta
• cross-gcc_242_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of cross-gcc_242_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Processed: unarchiving 927230 Debian Bug Tracking System
• Processed: closing 947235 Debian Bug Tracking System
• cross-gcc_241_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of cross-gcc_241_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Bug#947235: port patches to gcc-10 Helmut Grohne
  • Bug#947235: port patches to gcc-10 Dima Kogan
• cross-gcc_238_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of cross-gcc_238_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• cross-gcc_235_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of cross-gcc_235_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Processed: closing 927230 Debian Bug Tracking System
• state of mipsen cross toolchains Helmut Grohne
  • Re: state of mipsen cross toolchains Matthias Klose
  • Re: state of mipsen cross toolchains Helmut Grohne
  • Re: state of mipsen cross toolchains YunQiang Su
  • Re: state of mipsen cross toolchains Matthias Klose
• Bug#942874: cross-gcc: Please make it source-only when making new uploads Boyuan Yang
  • Bug#942874: marked as done (cross-gcc: Please make it source-only when making new uploads) Debian Bug Tracking System
• cross-gcc_234_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of cross-gcc_234_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Your Debian package(s) will not migrate to testing Julian Gilbey
• cross-gcc_232_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of cross-gcc_232_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Bug#936092: gcc-9 patches apply even less Helmut Grohne
  • Processed: gcc-9 patches apply even less Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#936092: marked as done (gcc-9 patches apply even less) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#932762: fakeroot file somefile: Bad system call Helmut Grohne
• cross-gcc_231_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of cross-gcc_231_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Bug#928035: gcc-9 patches no longer applies Helmut Grohne
  • Bug#928035: marked as done (gcc-9 patches no longer applies) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#927230: cross-gcc-dev: gcc-9 patch application failure Helmut Grohne
  • Processed: cross-gcc-dev: gcc-9 patch application failure Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#927230: closing 927230 Helmut Grohne
  • Processed: Re: Bug#927230: closing 927230 Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#927230: cross-gcc-dev: gcc-9 patch application failure Dima Kogan
  • Bug#927230: marked as done (cross-gcc-dev: gcc-9 patch application failure) Debian Bug Tracking System
• cross-gcc_230_source.changes REJECTED Debian FTP Masters
• Processed: fix versions for 925950 Debian Bug Tracking System
• Processed: unblock: cross-gcc/230 Debian Bug Tracking System
• cross-gcc_230_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• cross-gcc_229_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• cross-gcc is marked for autoremoval from testing Debian testing autoremoval watch
  • cross-gcc is marked for autoremoval from testing Debian testing autoremoval watch
  • cross-gcc is marked for autoremoval from testing Debian testing autoremoval watch
  • cross-gcc is marked for autoremoval from testing Debian testing autoremoval watch
  • cross-gcc is marked for autoremoval from testing Debian testing autoremoval watch
• Processing of cross-gcc_230_source.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Geldsorgen? test
• Processed: closing 878356 Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#925950: patches no longer apply for gcc-8 and gcc-9 Helmut Grohne
  • Bug#925950: patches no longer apply for gcc-8 and gcc-9 Dima Kogan
  • Bug#925950: patches no longer apply for gcc-8 and gcc-9 Helmut Grohne
  • Bug#925950: patches no longer apply for gcc-8 and gcc-9 Tobias Frost
  • Bug#925950: patches no longer apply for gcc-8 and gcc-9 Dima Kogan
  • Processed: Re: Bug#925950: patches no longer apply for gcc-8 and gcc-9 Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Processed: Re: Bug#925950: patches no longer apply for gcc-8 and gcc-9 Debian Bug Tracking System
• Processing of cross-gcc_230_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of cross-gcc_229_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• cross-gcc_226_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of cross-gcc_226_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• cross-gcc_223_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of cross-gcc_223_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• cross-gcc_220_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of cross-gcc_220_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• cross-gcc_218_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of cross-gcc_218_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Bug#918397: cross-gcc-dev should support gcc-9 Helmut Grohne
  • Bug#918397: cross-gcc-dev should support gcc-9 Dima Kogan
  • Bug#918397: marked as done (cross-gcc-dev should support gcc-9) Debian Bug Tracking System
• cross-gcc_217_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of cross-gcc_217_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• cross-gcc_216_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of cross-gcc_216_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• cross-gcc_213_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of cross-gcc_213_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• cross-gcc_210_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters

• Earlier messages