On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 11:47:45 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > It showed up as well :( The libg++272 _and_ the gcc272 packages were > translated on a glibc-2.0 based system. Not sure if it's worth making > these to build on glibc-2.1, because no native Debian package depends > on the old libg++ (well, one or two ...). Another thing are the > libstdc++2.8 and libstdc++2.9 packages.
Losing these would mean abandoning support for some quit popular non-free software, like Netscape and possibly IBM's DB2. If there is any possibility of getting some kind of glibc2.0-altdev environment for glibc2.1, we should really try to make it happen. Ray -- Cyberspace, a final frontier. These are the voyages of my messages, on a lightspeed mission to explore strange new systems and to boldly go where no data has gone before.
