Christian Kurz writes: > On 99-11-07 Matthias Klose wrote: > > why is this package important, it's _optional_? > > Which c-compiler is used by us, the maintainers and our users? Mostly is > gcc and so it's important that it becomes fixed. If you don't consider > those packages as important, I think you are leaving in an other world > then myself.
Yes, I think so as well. As Chris pointed out, if the compiler cannot compile all packages with -O2 but can so with lower optimizations and these packages are _optional_, then it's not considered release critical.
