On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:32:40PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Ben Collins writes: > > Can we have a libgcc.so and a libgcc.a at the same time? If so can we > > force all of the libs in glibc to link with the latter while binaries > > link with libgcc.so? > > $ locate /libgcc > /lib/libgcc_s.so.300 > /usr/doc/libgcc300 > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.7.2.3/libgcc.a > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.3/libgcc.a > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.0/libgcc.a > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.0/libgcc_s.so > > Note that /lib/libgcc_s.so.300 is /lib/libgcc_s.so.0; I patched the > scripts not to use upstream names until the ABI is frozen for 3.0.
Er, won't that cause problems for anything that links to it? Did you change the SONAME? Dan /--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\ | Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
