Neil L. Roeth writes: > I don't think you understand - I don't believe there is a bug in gcc.
You're right. Until you describe the problem and submit an appropriate bug report, I don't understand it. If it's not a gcc bug, then a statement why A+ cannot use gcc-2.95.3 would be helpful. I cannot find such a statement on the web page. > The source code I am trying to compile is just not up to date with the > differences between 2.91.66 and 2.95.2. While we work on updating the > source code to 2.95.2, there's value to me in making the older > compiler available in potato (or woody) so I can make a Debian package > out of it now. - you cannot make egcs-1.1.2 available in potato; it's frozen. - as Ray pointed out egcs-1.1.2 doesn't build with glibc-2.2.
