On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 08:18:03AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Turns out that I've missed the file completely. Sorry. Riku, could you > > please include it during your review? > > this is now fixed; the package is uploaded to experimental and sticks > in NEW.
Wow, well, I didn't expect that you'd push that half baked package into NEW, but I guess it's OK. Also note that doe doc package is empty; I hope the FTP masters don't reject the package for that! > I did see that you used -ffloat-store to build both refblas3 and > lapack3, which is a huge performance hit; while it seems to be ok for > starting the transition, I would consider this RC. Camm did mention a > fix for the failing complex testcases. Actually, I made a mistake by doing that. I never attempted to build it without that option. I will try it now. > Next one would be atlas3 (new upstream version 3.8); please could you > have a look at it (without using -ffloat-store for the build)? I cannot do it this week, will definitely try it next week, though. Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
