Sam Halliday schrieb: > On 26 Nov 2007, at 14:40, Camm Maguire wrote: >> This is currently in progress. I had decided to get the gfortran >> transition in first, but there appear to be portability issues which >> might take a reasonable time to fix. I suppose a separate lapack3.1 >> is in order while this is worked out. > > > Thanks :-) > > btw... gfortran currently points to gfortran-4.2 whereas all the other > gcc virtual packages point to version 4.1. I've had some problems > linking to libgfortran in version 4.2 and have reverted to 4.1 > (specifically when building ARPACK). Don't know if you're aware of this, > but I'd suggest pointing gfortran to gfortran-4.1 for now.
no, reverting back to 4.1 is not a solution. please test with gfortran-4.3 (experimental) if the problem persists. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
