Luk Claes wrote: > The brokenness is in the packages that FTBFS, it was never guaranteed to > have dependencies installed in any particular order and it really > shouldn't be.
Maybe not, but it *did* work that way and over time many packages have come to rely on it. Changing it without prior announcement was not a good thing. Discovering that it broke things and not changing it back while discussing the problem is unprofessional behaviour at best. regards, Colin -- Colin Tuckley | +44(0)1903 236872 | PGP/GnuPG Key Id Debian Developer | +44(0)7799 143369 | 0x1B3045CE "My mind free-associates far too much; I'm going to have to start charging it." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
