On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ondrej Certik writes: >> Hi, >> >> thanks Matthias for raising this issue. I am interested in helping with >> this. >> >> We need to maintain the packages in a svn/git repository and I suggest >> we simply create new packges, something like >> >> libatlas3.8-* >> >> or something. We get it compile, we get it to debian and we start fixing >> all potential problems. Let's have both atlas 3.6 and atlas 3.8 and >> users will simply use those, that work. When we get 3.8 in a good shape, >> we may then for example remove the libatlas-* packages and provide them >> with libatlas3.8-* etc. > > please don't rename the package without reason. uploads to > experimental should do fine here.
Yes, I forgot about experimental. Yes, that would work perfectly fine. Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
