Wookey <woo...@wookware.org> writes: >> Thanks for the report, Wookey. It looks like I already fixed this in >> cross-gcc-dev=128. This doesn't affect stable, obviously. Did you want >> to deal with that somehow, like in a backport, or something? > > cross-gcc has now moved on to v135. Does that still work in stable, or > do I have to persuade the stretch-updates people to use a version no > longer in unstable? Your recent changes may only be for gcc-7, so > maybe the current version does work on the gcc-6 in stable, which has > no gcc-7. That would simplify things.
I just checked. The patch set WAS updated to the later gcc-6 in sid, but these updates only affected the line numbers, so the latest gcc-6 patches in cross-gcc-dev=135 do apply to gcc-6/stable (6.3.0-18), albeit with a little bit of fuzz. It looks like gcc-5 and gcc-7 are not in stable, so we only care about gcc-6. Yes?