Helmut Grohne <[email protected]> 于2019年10月29日周二 上午4:51写道： > > Hi Matthias, > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 09:28:14PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > If you think, there is coordination needed, then you were probably not aware > > of dropping mips as a release architecture and not adding it as a port. > > I'm sorry, my previous mail contained a very misleading typo. Where I > wrote "crossbuild-essential-mips", I actually meant > "crossbuild-essential-mipsel". No, I'm not trying to get "mips" back. > > Due to this typo, your answer does not answer any of my questions. I'm > actually interested in the fate of the remaining release mipsen > architectures. Or maybe I'm missing plans to remove all mipsen as > release architectures? >
So, should we make crossbuild-essential-mipsel/crossbuild-essential-mips64el back in src:build-essential? I will figure out a mipsen src package and build other non-release architectures. > > The move of the remaining two mips* targets to -cross-mipsen were > > coordinated with YunQiang Su, however I didn't expect him adding back mips. > > It's great that you coordinated it with YunQiang Su. However > coordinating the development of cross toolchains with debian-cross would > seem to be a fairly obvious thing to do, no? Especially if your changes > render cross toolchains unusable for months. > > Helmut
