Markus Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ich kann mir übrigens beim besten Wissen nicht vorstellen, warum ein > sync Schreibzugriff mehr auf dem Stick "rumschreiben" sollte als ein > async?
http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/22/111748.html Zitat: ,---- | What happens, with the sync option on a VFAT file system, is that the | FAT tables are getting pounded and over-written over and over and over | again as each and every block/cluster is allocated while a new file is | written out. This constant overwriting eventually wears out the first | block or two of the flash drive. `---- Und weiter: ,---- | I had lost a couple of flash keys previously, without realizing what | was going on, but what send me off investigating this was when I | copied a 700 Meg file to a brand new 1G USB 2.0 flash memory key in a | USB 2.0 slot. It took over a half an hour to copy to the drive, which | really had me wondering WTF was wrong! Then, when I went to use the | key, I found the first couple of blocks were totally destroyed. Read | errors immediately upon insertion. `---- ,---- | Copying that 700 Meg file resulted in thousands upon thousands upon | thousands of writes to the FAT table and backup FAT table. It simply | blew through all the rewrites for those blocks and burned them up. `---- S° -- Sven Hartge -- professioneller Unix-Geek Meine Gedanken im Netz: http://sven.formvision.de/blog/ -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject "unsubscribe". Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
