also sprach Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.05.1635 +0200]: > Do you have more than 2 sub-keys?
pub 1024D/330C4A75 2001-06-20 Martin F. Krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uid Martin F. Krafft (AERAsec GmbH) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uid Martin F. Krafft (Debian) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uid Martin F. Krafft (MB! Sudetia) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uid Martin F. Krafft (Uni Zuerich) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sub 2048g/D99FEE8D 2001-06-20 [expires: 2002-06-20] sub 2048g/900227D4 2002-06-20 [expires: 2003-06-20] looks like it. Is this not the way I should be doing it? > This has been discussed here many times. Sorry, I couldn't find a reference. > I, for one, created a new GPG key for Debian application to avoid this > problem :-( I don't want to do that for I want one key for everything. Is my key now corrupted? Interestingly, when I pull the key from wwwkeys.pgp.net it shows up just fine but the two subkeys used for encryption aren't downloaded. They are when i retrieve the key from keyring.debian.org. This is annoying. Why can't the pgp.net folks maintain working keyservers? -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck "glaube hei�t nicht wissen wollen, was wahr ist." - friedrich nietzsche
msg05544/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
