On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 09:59:21AM -0400, James Morris wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Russell Coker wrote: > > > On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 03:01, Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It's actually disabled again (compiled in but disabled) in SuSE because > > > the performance hit was much much worse. And I remember benchmark > > > numbers where the lsm hooks alone decreased the SpecWeb numbers on ia64 > > > by more than 10%. I'd vote strongy against enabling LSM in the Debian > > > kernel images. > > When did you see these figures? They are not consistent with the > performance data I've seen. to be absolutely honest, i cannot remember.
i saw it once, in some se/linux documentation or a faq, and then took that as read. l. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
