* Edward Guldemond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-09 14:57:26 -0500]: > On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 09:45:36AM -0500, N. Thomas wrote: > > Debian <-> RedHat = 200Kbs ??? > > Debian <-> Windows = 200Kbs ??? > > Maybe it's not the Debian box that is misconfigured, maybe it's the > RedHat or Windows boxen? Are there any weird messages in the Linux > syslogs, or the Windows log viewer? What NICs are you using on the > machines?
Actually, apart from a CD burner on the Redhat box, it and the Debian machines are identical. The NICS are built into the motherboard, the company is called SiS. The RedHat/Windows logs revealed nothing, but I found this nugget in /var/log/syslog of the Debian box: Nov 9 12:54:39 seneca kernel: sis900.c: v1.06.09 09/28/2001 Nov 9 12:54:39 seneca kernel: eth0: SiS 900 PCI Fast Ethernet at 0xcc00, IRQ 5, 00:0a:e6:12:e3:cd. Nov 9 12:54:39 seneca kernel: eth0: Unknown PHY transceiver found at address 1. Nov 9 12:54:39 seneca kernel: eth0: Using transceiver found at address 1 as default What does it mean? I saw it upon bootup as well. > One thing I would suggest is to try a different hub. I doubt it's the hub > though... I'm using a switch, and swapping ports doesn't seem to change anything. Still, I might end up having to return it to the store if the problem persists. =-( thomas -- N. Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Etiamsi occiderit me, in ipso sperabo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]