<major snip> > From: "Kevin Wang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Actually, if you installed with Woody and afterwards change sources > list to > testing, everything would go mad. > > So just use sarge to install if that's what finally you like to use. It should not be a problem to use dist upgrade, you will replace most if not all the packages, but it should work. If it doesn't then post with your error messages, and file bug reports against those that fail. Of course using a Sarge iso will also work, but it really depends on your needs. It also depends on your hardware, if you have new hardware then I would use the Sarge iso. It also depends on if your system is a production system, if your system must be 99.999% uptime and reliable, then woody would work. If this system is used at home or not a critical system then Sarge should be fine, in fact some people think Sarge is 99.998% ready for production. If your job depended on it I would stick to woody, otherwise use Sarge. As far as I know testing is the same as Sarge, untill testing is frozen, and Sarge is released. When Sarge is released after a little while the new testing or etch, will begin anew. So if you already have Sarge in your source list you won't need to worry. That is unless you want to follow testing, then it will be some time yet. Rthoreau -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]