-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 mm wrote:
> Is there any compelling reason to use `apt-get' over `aptitude', given > the latter's more robust feature set (installation tracking, for > example)? > The compelling reason could be that I just like apt-get and I don't see anything not achievable in it that I should switch to something else. > I've been using aptitude exclusively for about a year for installing > packages, yet still see a lot of new documentation with directives to > install/upgrade with apt-get. You can contribute more documentation for aptitude still. rrs - -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT -- http://www.researchut.com Gnupg Key ID: 04F130BC "Stealing logic from one person is plagiarism, stealing from many is research." "Necessity is the mother of invention." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCdNDZ4Rhi6gTxMLwRAitbAJwOHb8h6Poybl2R5Ogjya55/cgTcwCeNN9J ZleTWuFqmzIkMJep8jJAlIk= =ToXm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
