On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 10:55:42PM +0200 or thereabouts, Felix Natter wrote: > Steve A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Is there any particular reason for using '.eps' ? Is it to be printed ? I > > would > > use gif or png and make the background transparent. > > I am using a standard LaTeX document class for presentations (prosper), > which requires me to use latex+dvips+ps2pdf, and dvips only supports > .eps for images...
O OK
> Do you have the same problems? I can't imagine why a simple bitmap->bitmap
> conversion (without loss, as opposed to jpeg!) would have this kind
> of effect. Must be a bug somewhere!
No, but then I don't use the same tools. I use Adobe products and if using the
.eps as the end format -- The transparency might need to be flattened before
saving as .eps.
> > You should be able to make
> > the eps transparent as well -- I'm not sure of the GIMPs capabilities in
> > that
> > format.
>
> GIMP reports that "eps does not support transparency".
You might be able to use PNG, make the background transparent, flatten, then
save as .eps. See if that works ...
--
Steve A.
-----------------------------------------------
Monday May 30 2005 08:25:01 EDT
-----------------------------------------------
Complex system:
One with real problems and imaginary profits.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
