Hamish Moffatt hat gesagt: // Hamish Moffatt wrote: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> mutt can handle message status (read or unread) in folders
> other than your inbox where elm does not. It is very elm-like
> but seems faster and smaller yet just as functional to me.
> For the same reason, it may be too elm-like to meet your requirements.
I have used elm for some years now and recently switched to mutt. I have
to say: Mutt is a really really great mail reader. Every elm user
absolutely has to give it a try, it's so much better, IMHO, faster and more
configureable.
If you fear the conversion of mail folders/boxes: Not necessary, because
Mutt reads them all!
Or in the words of mutt-developer Micheal Elkins ( = the ME in elm-ME):
`All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less.'
--
Yours,
Frank Barknecht
<<<<---------------------------------------------------->>>>
<a href="http://www.koeln-online.de/einblick/";>
Das Kölner Stadt- und Unimagazin
</a>
<<<<--------------------------------------------------->>>>>
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
