-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Sat, 16 Aug 1997, Bruce Perens wrote:
> From: Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Does bash 2.01 solve the problem? We do update 'stable' - we're > > currently debating that strategy on the debian-private (developers only) > > mailing list right now. If bash 2.0 is sufficiently broken, then that > > might > > merit putting 2.01 into 'stable'. > > I'm going to have to set this straight, since Jim alluded to a discussion > on our private list. > > The next version of the system will be called "Debian 1.3.1 Revision 1". > People who make long-term products based on Debian requested that > we not change the version number of the system if we were only making a > few bug fixes. For example, X windows was rebuilt because Richard Hang on, aren't I already running Debian 1.3 Revision 1 (or in other words Debian 1.3.1)? Anand. - -- `When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, "This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know," the end result is tyranny and oppression no matter how holy the motives' -- Robert A Heinlein, "If this goes on --" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBM/kaAWRmcAD8BdppAQGqdQP/RIO4Z/cn09o0+qX/vXHwjm2phpMixWmn SZL9ygN1rZL0Kn+8NCVigRPUAnzASMEa3ivEL7H9JyW1r5PjjlRI2ljWedxKDmhr IHGlxTFyub0yGZAMEQ3vCP0N12RRIZkXUBJdXKLEnnAbtO5RLT0gA52OlIz31LoJ 9HqfPt+nSD0= =7P8H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .