Carey Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> So it certainly looks like Orn needs to fix his mailer. > > RFC2047 is also applicable - it's responsible to the mangled addresses > you see sometimes if you MUA isn't aware of the proposed standard. > However, I don't think it should be applied to Date: headers.
I agree. > Also, I note that RFC822 defines the day part of a date as only the > English names, not something like "Mi=F0" (however that turns out when > TM and various MTA's get done with it). And the only valid > non-numeric time zones are: UT GMT EST EDT CST CDT MST MDT PST PDT, or > a single letter except J (not "BST"). RFC1123 says you should use numeric timezones only (but must understand some of the text ones). See section 5.2.14. > RFC822 also seems to have a year-2000 bug. RFC1123 says you should use 4 digit dates. Same section as above. It also modifies the syntax of RFC822 to allow this to work l-) -- http://www.elmail.co.uk/~richard/ -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .