Hi, [Concerning a possible bug in flex-2.5.4]
For the example I gave, Manoj and Maarten suggest adding ``return 0'' to the action after the input() receives an EOF, and in this case it would solve the problem, but I don't think that this should be necessary and there are other situations where this would not work so well. I still think that there is a problem with flex-2.5.4, but this discussion doesn't really belong on debian-user, so I will email my objections to Manoj and Maarten (and anyone else who sends a request), and then ask some questions on comp.lang.c before taking it to gnu.utils.bug. I'll post a note back here vindicating either flex-2.5.4 or my suspicions when I figure it all out. Kirk Hilliard -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
