On Fri, 5 Dec 1997, John Bradley Fitzgibbons wrote:
> I've been watching all of the messages concerning libc6 upgrades and now
> I've just got to ask. How unstable is hamm? My major interest is due to
I've been running a mostly-hamm system since July, and haven't had any
problems other than:
At one point about a month ago I synced up my machine with the unstable
tree, because I was getting utmp errors. Libc6 has redefined a mess of
those basic data types, so things like "w" and "who" weren't working.
Haven't had any trouble since then.
Otherwise, just make sure you follow the libc5-to-libc6 howto so you
don't really screw up dpkg.
Will
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| http://www.cis.udel.edu/~lowe/ |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|The problem with computers: |
| |
| rivendell[501] [~]> love me |
| bash: love: command not found |
| rivendell[502] [~]> hug me |
| bash: hug: command not found |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
