Hi, > combination in between. It has a good package system and does not seem to > have > as many bugs as redhat. Although I could be wrong since red hat has a lot of > patches. Try them yourself and get a feel for it.
This could be interpreted several ways. Either RedHat is quicker at getting bugs fixed, RedHat has more bugs, Debian is slower at getting bugs repaired or Debian has less bugs. I tend to think that Debian is a technically superior distribution, i.e. in the way it is put together and managed, perhaps resulting in less bugs. I've spoken to a colleague who uses RedHat 5.0. He told me the initial release was _very_ buggy. Hence, RedHat would almost have to put out many patches. Don't get me wrong, I believe RedHat to be a fine distribution, too. I just prefer Debian. -Ossama -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
