Jules Bean wrote: > Now, I can understand that a 486/100 is not the fastest machine around. > But I can't see why there should be a difference of about 2 orders of > magnitude between a 486/100 and a Pentium 133. Also - and tellingly - > in.telnetd is not taking up CPU time on the machine during this time. If > I watch 'top', in.telnetd takes up CPU for maybe a few seconds, and > thereafter the machine is idle.
Try attaching a strace to it (strace -p <pid of in.telnetd>), and see if you can figure out what it's doing by the system calls it runs. -- see shy jo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]