On Tue, 29 Dec 1998, Wojciech Zabolotny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've stated that there is no old good String class in libstdc++.
> > Instead I've found the "string" header which defines the "string"
> > class. Is it OK to use it in new C++ programs, or it is added only
> > for compatibility? [...]
David Teague wrote:
>There is some semantic difficulty with <string>.
Wojciech:
I found the SGI URL that contains the discussion of problem with
strings I mentioned in a previous post:
http://www.sgi.com/Technology/STL/string_discussion.html
The next level up has a bunch of interesting topics. Dinkumware, PJ
Plauger's software company is another good resource. URL:
http://www.dinkumware.com/
--David Teague [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux: Because I want to get there Today!
Software patents remain land mines lying in wait to
destroy the practice of programming.
