On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Joey Hess wrote:
> mike shupp wrote:
> > Amber on black used to be recommended in Olden Times.
> > But I'm surprised you find white on black better than black on white.
> > The white letters stand out true, but black on white is closer to
> > normal reading, and ought to seem less obtrusive.
> Normal paper doesn't glow in the same cancerous way as a CRT.
I'm a bit skeptical about the likelihood of getting cancer
from CRT screens in general and from modern energy-saving
low-emission CRTs in particular. Do you regard these things
as more deadly than TV sets, which people have been using
for half a century-- without notable (radiative) effect?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Shupp
California State University, Northridge
Graduate Student, Dept. of Anthropology
http://www.csun.edu/~ms44278/index.htm
