I don't intend to debate the pros and cons of editors v/ wysiwyg. My aim is to have secretaries, dilberts, etc. edit memos, documents, etc. and have it set in html. Therefore, it must have the functions of a word processor (i.e., wp8) but save in as clean an html format as possible.
I do not foresee the need to have the html code itself edited. These documents are intended for web access, archival, and indexing. The code does not have to be perfect. Indexable is the real aim (to build a searchable library of internal documents). NatePuri Certified Law Student & Debian GNU/Linux Monk McGeorge School of Law [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ompages.com On Thu, 18 Mar 1999, fockface dickmeat wrote: > vi works best. There are few things worse than editing WSIWYG produced > html. > > > >From: George Bonser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To: Paul Puri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org > >Subject: Re: what's the best html wordprocessor? > >Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 23:55:42 -0800 (PST) > > > >On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Paul Puri wrote: > > > >> StarWriter is the best I've seen so far for Linux. The memory needs > >> for this thing can be a bit too high for most users though. I can't > >> wait to check out what the gnome word processor will do. > > > >Word perfect also has an html composer mode and I think LyX will allow > you > >to save as html. > > > > > > > > > >-- > >Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] > < /dev/null > > > > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null > >
