Well, I can't get it to print either. I get the following messages: sh: /usr/local/glibc20/libdl.so.2: no version information available (required by sh) sh: /usr/local/glibc20/libdl.so.2: no version information available (required by sh) sh: /usr/local/glibc20/libc.so.6: no version information available (required by sh) sh: /usr/local/glibc20/libc.so.6: no version information available (required by sh) sh: /usr/local/glibc20/libc.so.6: no version information available (required by /lib/libreadline.so.2) sh: /usr/local/glibc20/libc.so.6: no version information available (required by /lib/libreadline.so.2) sh: /usr/local/glibc20/libc.so.6: no version information available (required by /lib/libncurses.so.4) sh: /usr/local/glibc20/libc.so.6: no version information available (required by /lib/libncurses.so.4) sh: error in loading shared libraries: /usr/local/glibc20/libc.so.6: undefined symbol: _dl_global_scope_end
I looked in the various libraries in: /usr/local/glibc20 and /usr/local/opt/Office50/lib and found some hard-coded path to libraries in /lib while we would like staroffice to use those in /usr/local/glibc20/. I tried to to patch (using the same sed trick) some but did not found the one with the problem. I am not much concerned about printing, so I am not looking any further, hopefully, this path may lead to the solution. Best regards, Bernard On Mon, Apr 26, 1999 at 01:53 -0500, Ryan Losh wrote: > > > > [Lengthy instructions for "tricking Star Office 5.0[1] into executing on a > > glibc2.1 system deleted] > > > > I'd like to know if *ANYONE* out there has gotten Star Office 5 to *PRINT* > on a potato system running glibc2.1??? If so, would you please post your > "recipe" to this list. **EXECUTING** Star Office is of little value to > (most) people, if you CANNOT PRINT FROM IT!! > > Ryan > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
