On Sat, May 01, 1999 at 18:01:51 +0200, I wrote: > On Sat, May 01, 1999 at 21:10:13 +0530, M.K.Pai wrote: > > Even more puzzling, why does qmail go in as non-free ? > > qmail is not free software. The qmail license prohibits Debian from > redistributing binaries, as the require prior approval by the qmail > author.
It has been pointed out to me that qmail binaries are distributable under a strict set of conditions (ftp://koobera.math.uic.edu/www/qmail/dist.html). So be it; I stand corrected. This in no way changes qmail's non-freeness. Ray -- J.H.M. Dassen | RUMOUR Believe all you hear. Your world may [EMAIL PROTECTED] | not be a better one than the one the blocks | live in but it'll be a sight more vivid. | - The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan