Martin Bialasinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The thing is, that you could manage :0 with xdm, :1 with wdm and XDMCP > with gdm or such. So the packages don't conflict in a traditional > sense. But looks like all of them try to manage :0 and therefore there > is this mess.
Wouldn't this be solved by having a general S99dm:0 startup script and having that managed by the alternative system? Jan
