On Fri, Aug 13, 1999 at 10:25:50AM -0700, Mike Nachlinger wrote: > On Fri, 13 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Does anyone have experience with the following? > > > > 1. Running AcceleratedX with Debian. > > 2. Running Xfree86 3.3.4 with Debian. > > 3. Having them both available on one machine. > > > > You have to install and have working an X server before installing > AcceleratedX. > I've been using it for about 5 years on differant video cards and it works > great. Don't know about the G400 on 5.x but I've got a G200 on 4.2 and it > works > much better then Xfree86.
I've got a G200 AGP in my main box, running XF86 3.3.3.1, and it seems quite stable and reasonably quick. What's better about AcceleratedX? > As for stability AcceleratedX has Xfree86 beat here also. X crashes suck. > I understand Xfree86 has got much better however. AX supports > many more cards, it's money well spent! I might be interested in buying it if it's significantly faster, I suppose, but is it? -- alisdair mcdiarmid [EMAIL PROTECTED] [if you see some guy spit on me knock him on the side of the head]
