On 19 Nov 1999, Brian May wrote: bam >ext2? removable?
ext2 non removable bam >Why do you want the "sosuid" and "nodev" options? i saw a tip on linux.com about running users in chroot'd home, and to prevent devices from being made so they can access tehm i mounted the filesystem (/users in this case) nodev, and nosuid for well no suid binaries :) i have scripts that wipe them out daily but not allowing them in the first place is always handy. since the chroot stuff didnt work out, and the author of the tip never replied to my request for help i can take the nodev option out, but would like to keep the nosuid option. BUT i can take it off too, its not a huge deal. just wanted to know if/why those files appeared to need to be suid. nate ----------------------------------------[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- Vice President Network Operations http://www.firetrail.com/ Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/ Everett, WA 425-348-7336 http://www.linuxpowered.net/ Powered By: http://comedy.aphroland.org/ Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMP http://yahoo.aphroland.org/ -----------------------------------------[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- 6:17pm up 91 days, 5:52, 1 user, load average: 1.57, 1.59, 1.61
