On 2000-02-23 18:20:21, Brian May wrote: > >>>>> "Allan" == Allan M Wind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is EtherExpress Pro any better then EtherExpress? EtherExpress support > seems unreliable (despite the help comment in Linux source) at best > and often spews out warnings (2.2.x), IIRC about unexpected > interrupts. I asked about this on the linux-kernel mailing list and > was told problems were expected. I don't know Brian. When I had spec out a couple of production quality machines (a year ago), I looked through mailing lists and choose the Intel EtherExpress Pro's over 3com 905 as the Intel NICs seemed to be the preferred ones at that point. As I said, I don't know if that is the case anymore and I do have two 905 myself. Not seem any problems but I am not pushing them either. /Allan -- Allan M. Wind Finger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (GPG/PGP) P.O. Box 2022 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Woburn, MA 01888-0022 ICQ: 44214251 USA Phone: 781.279.4513
