At 07:53 PM 9/6/2000 -0400, David Z Maze wrote: >repeated 'apt-get upgrade's over time will leave you following the >"woody" distribution, even after it becomes frozen and eventually >stable. If you change it to "unstable", you will always track the >release that is considered "unstable"; this will be a different >release with some as-of-yet undetermined name when woody freezes.
But won't you need to do a dist-upgrade when the as-yet-unamed next unstable comes out? so isn't it better to keep going on the dist name? and keep track of developments? WARNING - This email is confidential and may contain copyright material. If you are not the intended recipient of Capital Monitor's original e-mail, please notify me by return e-mail, delete your copy of the message, and accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused. Republication or re-dissemination, including posting to news groups or web pages, is strictly prohibited without the express prior consent of Capital Monitor Pty Ltd. ____________________________________________________________ John Griffiths Tel 02 6273 4899 Capital Monitor Pty Ltd Fax 02 6273 4905 Press Gallery Mobile: 0412 690 643 Parliament House e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Canberra ACT 2600 http://www.capmon.com Australia ICQ No: 7933859
