Ok everybody, I get the point ; ). I've been set to 72 since the first message requesting it. I have a new perspective on the matter now.
-Rob On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 12:59:55PM -0500, Bob Bernstein wrote: > On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 05:26:04AM -0600, Rob VanFleet wrote: > > > Sorry, did some pasting in my last message and I guess I mucked things > > up a bit. Any particular reason as to 72? I was originally wrapping at > > 79 chars, which seemed to work well enough (no one complained at least). > > Keep in mind that your lines will end up quoted, which adds a couple of > chars. I use 72 all the time. > > As for no one complaining, I wouldn't turn to the majority for clues on how > to set a good example of email netiquette! <g> > > > -- > Bob Bernstein > at > Esmond, Rhode Island, USA > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
