will trillich said: > isn't redhat implementing apt-get on their stuff these days?
not that i've seen. I don't count up2date as an apt-get replacement since it only (appears) to track installed packages. there's a port of apt-get of course, but without a good archive to back it up, it's usefulness is limited. I migrated the company I last worked at to debian, didn't take too much convincing, when i started, nobody knew debian, some had heard of it, but nobody had used it. By the time I left, most everyone loved it. the 'fakeroot' package was an especially good hit with some of the developers. my favorite quote from my former boss: (sees redhat CVS machine booting up) boss: "what's that?" me: "redhat" boss: "screw that!" nate -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
