Thank you for your post to the comp.protocols.dns.bind newsgroup &
BIND Users Mailing List.
If you are sending your message from the comp.protocols.dns.bind
newsgroup, then your message has been sent to the moderator for approval.
Because of this, your post may take some time before it appears on the
newsgroup. DO NOT resend your message if you do not see it right away.
Thank You.
If you are sending your message thru the BIND Users Mailing List,
then your message was blocked by our mailing list software because you
sent your message from an address that is not in the subscriber list.
This restriction has been placed to prevent unsolicited emails from
reaching the lists (and to comp.protocols.dns.bind).
If you are subscribed then this is what may be happening:
For example, you may be subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED], but your email
address on your posts is set as [EMAIL PROTECTED] (if you sent your
mail as [EMAIL PROTECTED], it would go though). If that is the case,
just unsubscribe and resubscribe under the address you post from, and you
will no longer see this message when you send messages to the list.
If you are not subscribed to the list, then subscribe! You can do so by
sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with a subject line of
'subscribe'.
If you have any questions, you can send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Original mail message ---
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 24 01:13:31 2001
Received: from isrv3.isc.org (isrv3.isc.org [204.152.184.30])
by rc.isc.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) via ESMTP id BAA210087
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 01:13:26 -0700 (PDT)
env-from ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from extmail01.eth.net ([202.9.145.15])
by isrv3.isc.org (8.11.2/8.9.1) via ESMTP id f6O8DP502766
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 01:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
env-from ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 01:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eth.net ([202.9.145.10] RDNS failed) by extmail01.eth.net with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.1600);
Tue, 24 Jul 2001 12:55:34 +0530
Received: from mail pickup service by eth.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Tue, 24 Jul 2001 12:44:18 +0530
Received: from murphy.debian.org ([216.234.231.6]) by eth.net with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53);
Tue, 24 Jul 2001 06:09:53 +0530
Received: (qmail 8546 invoked by uid 38); 24 Jul 2001 00:14:24 -0000
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 21886 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2001 00:11:06 -0000
Received: from master.debian.org (216.234.231.130)
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2001 00:11:06 -0000
Received: from mailout06.sul.t-online.com (mailout06.sul.t-online.de)
[::ffff:194.25.134.19]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15Op86-00072K-00; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 18:28:50 -0500
Received: from fwd07.sul.t-online.de
by mailout06.sul.t-online.de with smtp
id 15Op6z-0004cL-01; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 01:27:41 +0200
Received: from fishbowl.home.madduck.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by
fmrl07.sul.t-online.com
with esmtp id 15Op6s-1WWhMWC; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 01:27:34 +0200
Received: by fishbowl.home.madduck.net (postfix, from userid 500)
id 8184B13DA0; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 01:27:31 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 01:27:31 +0200
From: "Martin F. Krafft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
debian users <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: (SOLVED) delegating NS control of subdomain to another BIND
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: "Martin F. Krafft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
debian users <[email protected]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
X-Motto: Bowie forever!
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: [email protected]
X-Mailing-List: <[email protected]> archive/latest/160026
X-Loop: [email protected]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jul 2001 07:25:34.0203 (UTC)
FILETIME=[D3B664B0:01C11411]
X-DCC-MAPS-Metrics: isrv3.isc.org 669; IP=37 env_From=21 From=65 Subject=4
Message-ID=3 Received=3 Body=1 Fuz1=1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
also sprach Kevin Darcy (on Mon, 23 Jul 2001 05:54:19PM -0400):
> Did you try adding "forwarders { }" to the madduck.net zone definition?
thanks to Kevin from the comp.protocols.dns.bind newsgroup, i found
the problem. i had six forwarders configured on my main DNS server,
which i thought are necessary to have with a DNS server that serves a
local zone, but otherwise caches queries from the internet. however,
forwarders in BIND seem to be pretty much what SMTP relays are - you
can use them, but if you don't, then any smart software like postfix
or bind (i.e. not micro$oft) will go and do the job themselves.
now, without the forwarders line, the subdomain is correctly
delegated, and while my DNS queries don't go through my provider's NS
servers anymore, it still works.
i'd still like to know if you can't configure forwarding so as to
allow subdomain delegations... usage of the german telekom nameservers
will surely save time and traffic, as they are heavily used...
thanks to all who helped!
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
windoze nt crashed.
i am the blue screen of death.
no one hears your screams.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Listar v1.0.0 - job execution complete.
