On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 07:27:13PM +0200, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 11:52:27AM -0500, ktb wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 08:48:22AM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
> > > Bud Rogers wrote:
> > >
> > > > Except that in this case we're not talking about a practice that was
> > > > not previously common or even not so common. We're talking about a
> > > > practice that was virtually unknown until Microsoft flooded the market
> > > > with badly broken mail and news clients that make it very difficult to
> > > > properly quote or attribute anything.
> > >
> > > True. In this situation, I wouldn't use the word "deprecated". I would
> > > just say that putting one's reply above the original message makes one
> > > look like an idiot.
> >
> > I like that...lol. I remember when I first started using linux I posted
> > to some list, probably this one. I wanted to know how to set Netscape
> > mail to default, like outlook, to appending my text to the top of the
> > message. You can imagine what response I got:D
> > kent
> >
> Did they tell you cannot "append" something before something else..
> (just teasing)
Got me .... :)
Lets start another definition thread. Kidding....just....kidding:)
kent
--
"The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the
same level of thinking we were at when we created them."
--Albert Einstein
