hi, usualy i get lots of emails from mailinglist, and netscrape -messenger is quite blocked untill all mails are downloaded. so i installed current ipopd, fetched my mail with "fetchmail $PROVIDER" from provider to local mda (exim). now i tried (actually i did...) to retrive emails from local ipopd with netscrape and very much mails got messed up, just like the one attached. subjects, sender, dates bodies, just all mixed up.
uups, just took a look on my mbox in /var/spool/mail. looks ok. reading it with mutt is ok too, even on mails that where messed up when received in messenger. so i suggest problem with popd (2001beta010722debian-4, oh, it's beta..;)? any idea what went wrong? btw: where does "From [EMAIL PROTECTED] " come from? Seems to be on all messed up mails. (just did an upgrade, so my woody/testing is current.) gk
--- Begin Message ---"Brooks R. Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > the worm wouldn't even know the difference, to it it looks like it would > > > hit microsofts site from your url if it tries those extentions. > > > > Not correct, it gets a Redirect as the response, and it's its > > responsibility to follow it, unless it's using a toolkit that does so > > automatically. > > > > Code Red, for instance, wouldn't follow redirects. > > What about port forwarding? It'd still up the CPU usage on a machine, but > would it have the same results? I so much want to do this. You could always set up a tarpit: http://www.hackbusters.net/LaBrea/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 22 00:08:03 2001 Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=gerhard) by fun2.at.home with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15kYHl-0000nf-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:56:37 +0200 Received: from fwdallmx.sul.t-online.de [194.25.134.26] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:56:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from murphy.debian.org ([216.234.231.6]) by mailin07.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 15kCM5-0ftTyin; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 00:31:37 +0200 Received: (qmail 7700 invoked by uid 38); 20 Sep 2001 21:54:18 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 23365 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2001 21:48:32 -0000 Received: from adsl-64-161-26-46.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net (HELO linux700) (64.161.26.46) by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 20 Sep 2001 21:48:32 -0000 Received: from 20 SStatus: craig by linux700 with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15kBfK-0003ZN-00 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:47:26 -0700 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:47:26 -0700 From: Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: nimda probes Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Resent-From: [email protected] X-Mailing-List: <[email protected]> archive/latest/170566 X-Loop: [email protected] Precedence: list Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-Bcc: Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:56:37 +0200 Status: O Content-Length: 967 Lines: 27 Sam Varghese wrote: > > Code Red, for instance, wouldn't follow redirects. > > try calling default.ida from my server -- > > http://www.gnubies.com/default.ida What for? If I do so with a browser, I'll presumably get redirected. But the virus wouldn't, because IT ISN'T A BROWSER AND DOESN'T SUPPORT HTTP REDIRECTS. Let's be clear on how redirects work. If someone requests default.ida f
--- End Message ---
