On 28-Sep-01, 17:22 (CDT), Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 03:29:39PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > Not needed, I'll settle for Essential: yes :) > > good idea :) > > it would also be nice for vim to have a higher alternatives precedence > than nvi.
It does. I just tested. Nvi uses 30, vim 120. > i often have to install vim on a system, then run "vi" and find i'm in > nvi rather than vim. yuk! Are you sure you don't have an alias or script earlier in the path? Or possibly you've got vim-tiny? Or you've picked up one of the i18nized nvi packages (I'm not sure what priorities they've been assigned.) Steve -- Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
