On 10 Mar 2003, Ron Johnson wrote:

> On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 09:22, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> > At 2003-03-10T13:10:02Z, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 
> > > ??????  RAID1 can only handle 1 failure also!!
> > 
> > Depends on how many drives are in the volume, doesn't it?
> 
> Hmmm.  By definition, RAID1 is "mirroring".  Never heard of putting
> any more than 2 disks in a mirrorset.  Never even thought of it,
> actually.  With more than 2 disks, I'd automatically go with RAID5.
> 

one approach is better than the other ... depending on the requirements
and specs and $$$ budgets


having 3 or 4 raid1 mirrored disks is good if..
        ( you can have as many drives in the raid1 array
        ( all with the same/identical data

        - you can suffer 3 of 4 disk dying.. :-)  and still limp along in
        degraded mode ( as if it was a single non-raid disk )

        - you really really cannot afford for the server to die
        because of a silly disk failure ... use multiple mirrors

        - and if you really really really really need to save data
        and cannot afford to lose it... ( like credit card processing )
        than save the data in SF, LA, NY, Miami, Dallas, etc

        - raid1  does NOT protect you against "rm -rf /"
        nor does it protect you against "rsync --delete"

having 4 disks in raid5...
        - if you lose one disks.... you're in degraded mode..
        - lose  and 2nd disk ... and kiss 4 disks worth of data bye-bye

if we assuming one disk reads at 50MB/sec
than having an 2nd raid1 disks reads at an effective 100MB/sec
        -- writing takes little longer to write since you have
        to do lot more work on more (slow) spindles

if you want 10 disks..
        first set of 5 disks .. use 4 + spare  --> one raid5
        second set of 5 disks . use 4 + spare  --> another raid5

        now raid1 both of those raid5 ... and you can read data 2x faster


-- i rather see more independent systems  than number of disks

-- you need more and more disks if you are storing 100-500GB mpeg files


more raid fun...
        http://www.1U-Raid5.net

        8x 240GB ide disks in one 1U ??? 
        ....nah .. too much thumb twidling when it goes down

c ya
alvin

fun stuff ???
-- a disk in LA ...   www1.foo.com 
-- a disk in NY ...   www2.foo.com
-- a disk in SF ...   www3.foo.com
-- a disk in DC ...   www4.foo.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to