Why limit yourself to just KDE and Gnome? What about blackbox? enlightenment, fvwm, cde, window maker, icewm, sawfish, afterstep, etc
Lots of little benefits here or there. Personally I like KDE. It has more of a flashy interface. It really doesn't matter. The others aren't obsolete. They just have different values. Each brings it's own unique flavor. Chris On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 09:29, Johan Ehnberg wrote: > Some thoughts... (gnome2, Kde3) > I myself use gnome2 > > KDE: good > -Better integration > -Good looking > -Konqueror inegration > -Easy to use > -Consistent naming > > KDE: bad > -Arts > -Bad support in Konqueror > -DisKusting names > > Gnome:good > -Easier to choose between apps (as in easier not to use Konq. for example) > -Nautilus2 > -Nice applets & panels > -Gdm2 looks good > -Inconsistent naming (as in freedom of naming) > > Gnome:bad > -Bad consistency in menus, settings etc. > -WM and DE not integrated > -Inconsistent naming (gtk-something, gnome-something, justsomething... > never know what uses GTK) > > /johan > > GBV wrote: > > >Hi all, > > > >I prefer KDE, Gnome seens obsolete, and using gtk lib i´m able to use Gnome > >appz on KDE with no problems at all, > > > >My objective with this message is to gather advantages and disvantages of > >this two great softwares.. > > > >Post your user and developer experience... > > > >thks... > > > >Guilherme Viebig > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Johan Ehnberg > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Windows? No... I don't think so." > -- "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech." - Benjamin Franklin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
