On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 06:42:04PM +0200, Dragos Delcea (Bucaresti, Ro) wrote: | well, thats about it...is it known not to?
Likely. Since gcc 3 is so new, it is also likely that there are bugs in it. The kernel tends to trigger some rare bugs in the compiler, which is why I beleive they only supported gcc 2.7.2 for a long time. I think now they've switched to 2.95.2 (or .3). If you can track down the cause of the non-compilation (kernel source bug, gcc bug, etc) that would certainly be benificial to all (assuming you publicize your findings :-)). -D -- (E)scape (M)eta (A)lt (C)ontrol (S)hift
