>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 15 14:24:13 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:24:10 +0100 Received: from master.debian.org ([216.234.231.5] ident=mail) by cibalia.gkvk.hr with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16biLK-0006kN-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:24:03 +0100 Received: from web21304.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.129.190] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16biFb-0008KD-00; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 07:18:07 -0600 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from [147.83.20.89] by web21304.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 05:11:56 PST Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 05:11:56 -0800 (PST) From: El Herrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Problem with gcc 2.95.2 in Debian 2.2 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= version=2.01 Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:39:52 +0100 Resent-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Hello, I have a problem with gcc 2.95.2 in Debian 2.2: My program (20,000 lines) compiles succesfully in both Debian 2.2 and 2.1. The compiled version in 2.1 works in both systems, but the version in 2.2 doesn't work in Debian 2.2 (nor in 2.1, as expected). The compilation flags I use are "-O3 -funroll-loops". I suspect that there is a dinamic memory problem (that I will probably find during the following ten years), but I have observed that in Debian 2.2 two compilations (from scratch) do not always generate equal binary files (by "do not always" I mean that sometimes are equal and sometimes not). Is doesn't happen in Debian 2.1. How can it happen? Thanks, Enrique __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Got something to say? Say it better with Yahoo! Video Mail http://mail.yahoo.com