On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 00:43:53 +0100 Hans Ekbrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 05:23:09PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 17:16:38 -0600 Dimitri Maziuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Note that they can still login via ssh + key auth, so remove > > > their ~/.ssh/authorized_keys[2] if you have that (rename > > > instead of removing, if you want to re-enable it later). > > > > How, if the password has been mangled? > > > > Authentication with public/private keys does not involve any password on the > server side, so why would the server-side password matter? Wel.... I assumed (yes, laugh at me, call me an MSCE) that the key pairs _and_ PAM was used during ssh login. What it sounds like you are saying is that there are (can be) different passwords for logging in from ssh vs. telnet/console/etc. That sounds bizarre. -- +------------------------------------------------------------+ | Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Jefferson, LA USA http://ronandheather.dhs.org:81 | | | | 484,246 sq mi are needed for 6 billion people to live, 4 ! ! persons per lot, in lots that are 60'x150'. | ! That is ~ California, Texas and Missouri. ! ! Alternatively, France, Spain and The United Kingdom. | +------------------------------------------------------------+
