-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 11:47:58PM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt wrote: > Just a quick interjection - the situation would appear comparable to > that of Bind (version 8) and Bind9 (not version 8) - a relatively clear > and apparently broadly accepted solution to packaging a noticeably > different successor system.
So does that mean bind9 will become bind10? Hell, I don't want to have to remember the version numbers of every package on my system. Version numbers in the package names considered harmful. - -- .''`. Baloo Ursidae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian admin and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+faVbJ5vLSqVpK2kRAg18AJ9zyj1bHWa07bnKBBG5WB9c5UnVjQCbBjMS ElNNyjrWpMc6WnWgkXAAOLE= =S/af -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
